The Merits of the Metrics

Print Friendly

I recommend a slightly more advanced unit than this.

Photo credit: Tag Heuer Stopwatch by Flickr user William Warby, used under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 license.

As I’ve posted before, different runners have different purposes and motivations.  Some run for health, some run to escape, some run to achieve clarity, some run for friendship.  For many of these goals, measurements like time and distance don’t matter much (though if you run for health, it’s likely you care about your weight, heart rate, blood pressure, and the like).  If that’s the case, I admire you and applaud your commitment to this great sport, but this post may not be for you.

Some of us run for performance, to push our limits, to set personal records, to reach ever-increasing goals.  While my motivations may change as I age and some of these drivers become more difficult to achieve, I currently fall in this category, and I’m not ashamed to admit it.  It fits my personality – I love work that involves metrics, be it sales, profit, period-to-period comparisons, or whatever else can be measured that shows progress.  I’m a competitive (but in a friendly, good-sport kind of way) person, and it drives my approach to many things I do in life.  I even check the analytics on this blog on a (too) regular basis, to see what you are most interested in, most eager to share, and what makes you passionate enough to join in the conversation.

For this type of runner, numbers mean a lot – maybe not “everything,” but definitely a lot.  We love tracking not just our totals but our splits. Elevation changes.  Heart rate (though I haven’t really gotten into that just yet).  We watch our trends over time – miles, average pace.  We create our own tracking spreadsheets because no other system seems to do it quite the way we want to see it. We compare workouts to previous efforts (and, to be frank, to the workouts of other similar runners) and analyze the differences.  We build training plans that count on improvements in performance, and obsess over our progress versus the plan (and use spreadsheets to track said progress).  We use calculators to predict our future race times and set targets.  And we couldn’t live without our GPS watches and related software (sorry, foot-strike related devices just aren’t precise enough for us).

Intense?  Yes.  Obsessive?  Could be.  Dangerous?  Maybe, if we don’t listen to our bodies and keep an eye on our balance (and, apparently even overuse of a GPS watch can cause injury).   But if performance is your goal, without focusing on metrics and investing in the tools and time required (and the time involves elements beyond just the actual training), you are running blind.  “Running naked” has its place.  But as my father-in-law likes to say (and offered me as career advice many years ago), “we have the infinite capacity to improve everything.”  There will someday come a time when the investment needed to make further improvements is not worth the return, due to risk of injuries, other priorities, etc.  Until then, I’ll obsess over my splits, even if it’s a “recovery” run, and just see where this journey takes us. Thank you for joining along on it so far, and I hope you’ll continue to join me.  At the end, I do run for friendship too, even if it’s more of the “virtual” kind.

Be Sociable, Share!

You may also find these interesting:

Tags: , , , , , ,

  • http://www.strengthrunning.com Fitz

    I’m also a metrics guy – I track everything from mileage, to long run progressions, to race performances. But during the actual act of running – when I step out the door – I usually have no fancy computers ( just a simple timex ), no water bottle or fuel belt, and certainly no fancy running shoes with “actuator lugs.” I guess you can call me a nerdy minimalist. :)

  • http://gregstrosaker.com Greg Strosaker

    Except for my love the GPS watch, I’m with you on minimizing everything else. I do use a hydration belt for long runs (but no gels), but want to reach to ever and ever less shoe content as well. Thanks for your comment and the RT, Fitz!

  • http://www.fogjog.org rob

    Interesting post. I once heard the running coach Jack Daniels give a talk. He recommended noting quantity and quality of sleep in one’s training log as well as all the usual stuff. He was definitely from the “there is no such thing as too much data” school.

  • http://gregstrosaker.com Greg Strosaker

    Thanks Rob, that’s something I haven’t really recorded (nor do I record any dietary details) but it may be worth doing. You know, I’n not that familiar with Jack Daniels (the coach or the libation), I’ll have to look up more about his approach.

  • http://twitter.com/Kuhndog Chad Kuhn

    Great post, Greg. I, too am into numbers and data. From my past in an intense Rotisserie Baseball league, to state and formative assessments of my 5th grade math students, to my running metrics, I love numbers. My GPS technology is still a Garmin armband and a Timex watch marketed by Reebok, but it tells me way more than my old watch did. It has also helped me concentrate on pace and improve the total results of my runs- in a very short time.

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention The Merits of the Metrics | Predawn Runner -- Topsy.com

  • http://gregstrosaker.com Greg Strosaker

    I was an engineer so numbers have always been a big part of my approach as well Chad. Thanks for your comment, I’d agree that focusing on numbers makes your progress accelerate.

  • Lindrud

    Yeah, this article describes me! I can get a little obsessive about the numbers!

  • http://gregstrosaker.com Greg Strosaker

    Dissertations and clinical research will do that to you, I suppose. Thanks for the comment, Susan!

  • Pingback: Getting the Most Out of Your Races: Learning From a Post-Mortem